Itm8 A/S — IP ranges & network footprint

IP Ranges (1)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
159.253.90.248/29	ITM8-CUST-REDBARNET-159_253_90_248_29	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● medium

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “ITM8 CUST” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

ITM8-CUST-CONTEXT-KSPV 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-CONTEXT-MBW 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-CONTEXT-JGH 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-CONTEXT-BB-DIST 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-SHARED-SERVICES1 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-MS-77_75_83_136_29 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-IMIND-77_75_83_200_29 1 blocks
ITM8-CUST-CONTEXT-HD 1 blocks

Combined view of all 198 name-family clusters →

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Cust Context Hd via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
Cust Context Kspv via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
Cust Context Mbw via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
Cust Context Jgh via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
Cust Context Bb Dist via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
Cust Shared Services1 via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
ITM8-CUST-MS-77_75_83_136_29 via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation
ITM8-CUST-IMIND-77_75_83_200_29 via Itm8 A/S sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (1 of 1)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE ITM8-MNT

Netblocks	1
Also registered under this name	198 netblocks across 198 separate records
Record ID	236196119
Registry	RIPE
Customers	see who runs inside this network →

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works · report an issue