BUSINESS-ET-DECISION — IP ranges & network footprint

IP Ranges (4)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
86.65.212.160/29	BUSINESS-ET-DECISION	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
92.103.42.0/29	BUSINESS-ET-DECISION	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
92.103.42.8/30	BUSINESS-ET-DECISION	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
92.103.168.32/32	BUSINESS-ET-DECISION	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “BUSINESS ET DECISION” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

BUSINESS-ET-DECISION-EOLAS 2 blocks

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Business Decision Interactive Eolas via Orange S.A. sub-allocation
Business Et Decision via Orange S.A. sub-allocation
Business Decision via Orange S.A. sub-allocation
BUSINESS-DECISION-GROUP via Orange Business Services SA sub-allocation
BUSINESS_DECISION_LTEE via Tata Communications Limited sub-allocation
Business Et Decision Corporate Service via Orange S.A. sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (4 of 4)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

COMPLETEL-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE LDCOM-MNT LDCOM-PRO-MNT

Netblocks	4
All fragments	6 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID	224135082
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works · report an issue