XCONNECT ID

Data as of 2026-09-20
BGP inherited
This organisation
Netblocks13
IPv6 6 prefixes (largest 2001:7fa:f::47e/128)
Record ID242526085
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customerssee who runs inside this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works · report an issue

IP Ranges (13)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
43.252.146.180/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
43.254.82.253/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.225.172.18/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
119.11.186.233/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
157.10.16.61/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
218.100.62.154/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
218.100.74.159/32 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7fa:f::47e/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2400:9c80:0:173::153:717/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2401:91e0:31::153:717:1/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2403:1a00::db/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2404:c8:0:a:0:15:3717:1/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2404:2f80:206::61/128 XCONNECT ID PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

IPv6 ranges (6)

Footprint over time

13 weekly snapshots · JSON
13 -4 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 17 2026-09-20

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
46.2% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 13)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS153717