URBANACCESS

Data as of 2026-09-27
Handle
This organisation
Netblocks12
IPv6 5 prefixes (largest 2001:7fa:2:5::122/128)
Also registered under this name 14 netblocks across 2 separate records
Record ID246704001
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customerssee who runs inside this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution RIR handle
Shared handles clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works · report an issue

IP Ranges (12)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
36.91.197.20/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
43.254.82.238/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.30.172.230/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.133.149.130/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
119.11.184.173/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
123.108.9.34/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
218.100.31.215/32 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7fa:2:5::122/128 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:df0:f080:cdc:cdc:cdc:cdc:32/128 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:df7:3400::429/128 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2401:91e0:31::140:429:1/128 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2404:c8:0:a:0:14:429:1/128 URBANACCESS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

IPv6 ranges (5)

Footprint over time

14 weekly snapshots · JSON
12 +2 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 12 2026-09-27

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
41.7% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (5 of 12)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS140429