TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 128 blocks across 16 clusters
Cluster ID210092475
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
185.97.8.80/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.8.88/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.9.80/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.9.88/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.10.80/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.10.88/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.11.80/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.97.11.88/29 TR-FOREKSBILGI-20150426 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “TR FOREKSBILGI” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 16 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
75.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MNT-ForeksBilgi