THINX
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 7 |
| Registered in | Poland (2) · Germany (1) · Netherlands (1) |
| All fragments | 10 blocks across 3 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 210113659 |
| Registry | PEERINGDB |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
5 weekly snapshots · JSON
7
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 7
2026-07-19
IP Ranges (7)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.81.196.234/32 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 193.239.119.222/32 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 195.182.219.170/32 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8::60ac:0:1/128 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:13::a502:4748:1/128 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 2001:7f8:42::2:4748:3/128 | THINX | PEERINGDB | ASSIGNED | ● high |
| 45.154.223.0/24 | THINX | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “THINX” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- THINX-SMS-A 2 blocks
- THINX-POLAND-NET 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- THINX-POLAND-NET via Atman Sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
- Thinxxs Kunde via VISTEC Internet Service GmbH sub-allocation
- Redge CDN Thinx via Redge Technologies sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
- Infrastructure via Thinxx GmbH sub-allocation
- Fra Net via Thinxx GmbH sub-allocation
- Core via Thinxx GmbH sub-allocation
- WEBTHINX-SRO via Hetzner Online GmbH sub-allocation
- Warsaw-IPv6-Thinx via Redge Technologies sp. z o.o. sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(7 of 7)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
AS24748
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
mnt-pl-tvpsa-1