R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 17 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID205940232
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
45.120.248.178/32 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.27.168.106/32 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.27.171.201/32 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:df2:1900:1::178/128 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2400:d180:67::fe/128 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2401:7500:fff6::226/128 R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.210.28.0/22 R_G_TECHNOSOLUTIONS APNIC ALLOCATED PORTABLE ● low
2401:fbc0::/32 R_G_TECHNOSOLUTIONS APNIC ALLOCATED PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “R G TECHNOSOLUTIONS” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
25.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (2 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS134922 MAINT-IN-IRINN NA556-AP NA556-AP