PT Menara Digital Salama

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 1,020 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 17 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID213164332
RegistryBGP
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 2 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
103.70.122.0/24 PT Menara Digital Salama BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
103.70.123.0/24 PT Menara Digital Salama BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
103.138.166.0/24 PT Menara Digital Salama BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
103.138.167.0/24 PT Menara Digital Salama BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
119.11.185.162/32 PT Menara Digital Salama PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
123.108.10.99/32 PT Menara Digital Salama PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
165.101.31.14/32 PT Menara Digital Salama PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7fa:2:5::273/128 PT Menara Digital Salama PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:df2:74c0::/48 PT Menara Digital Salama BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2404:c8:0:a:0:15:980:1/128 PT Menara Digital Salama PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “PT Menara” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
80.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS150980 AS150980