PDU-ID-MDN

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8 · 2,040 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 13 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID212137916
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
103.109.124.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
103.109.125.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
103.109.126.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
103.109.127.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
116.90.180.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
116.90.181.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
116.90.182.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
116.90.183.0/24 PDU-ID-MDN APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “PDU ID” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
RPKI-inferred operator PT. PANCA DUTA UTAMA
Nearly all of this network's RPKI-covered space is cryptographically authorized for this single operator — the registered netname is likely one of its internal infrastructure labels.
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS1969-AP AS1969-AP MAINT-ID-PDU