NURBANK

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9 · 343 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 12 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID208862173
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
88.204.130.64/29 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
88.204.224.156/30 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.218.46.96/27 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.46.63.48/30 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.46.214.128/30 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
95.56.231.208/30 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.193.234.0/24 NURBANK-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.154.141.64/27 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.154.156.192/29 NURBANK RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NURBANK” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.
  • Nurbank via JSC Kazakhtelecom sub-allocation
  • AONURBANK via JSC Kazakhtelecom sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ASTEL-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE KNIC-MNT