NORTH-WALES

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	6
All fragments	9 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID	205403214
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON

6 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05

2026-07-05 peak 6 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (6)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
62.7.37.216/29	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
2a00:2381:3f65::/56	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	ASSIGNED	● low
2a00:2381:3f65::/48	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	AGGREGATED-BY-LIR	● low
2a00:2381:cdc7::/48	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	AGGREGATED-BY-LIR	● low
2a00:2381:cdc7:100::/56	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	ASSIGNED	● low
2a00:2381:cdc7:200::/56	NORTH-WALES	RIPE	ASSIGNED	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NORTH WALES” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

North Wales Police via Claranet Limited sub-allocation
NORTH-WALES-POLICE via Claranet Limited sub-allocation
NORTH-WALES-TRAFFIC-CC via Jisc Services Limited sub-allocation
NORTHWALESPOLICE-GB via Telstra International Limited sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (6 of 6)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

BTNET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE