Netshop

NETSHOP
Registry
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
Registered in Netherlands (4) · MT (2)
All fragments 46 blocks across 10 clusters
Cluster ID210165874
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution Registry record
Shared handles clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.216.234.144/30 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.216.234.148/30 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.90.233.88/30 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.90.233.92/30 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
95.131.232.152/29 Netshop RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.168.160.16/28 Netshop RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2001:1a0a:8010:4b::/64 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:1a0a:8010:105::/64 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:104:1b2::/64 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:104:1b3::/64 NETSHOP RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NETSHOP” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 10 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EQUINIX-FULFIL-MNT EQUINIX-MNT MNT-BMIT-MT