NET-GB-Citadel

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks7
All fragments 10 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID210209658
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
57.133.220.16/28 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE LEGACY ● low
80.169.44.40/29 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.169.135.192/29 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.169.221.216/29 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.169.239.252/30 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.86.58.208/29 NET-GB-Citadel RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.86.255.160/29 NET-GB-CITADEL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NET GB Citadel” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 7)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

COLT-UK DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE