NET-FR-SILCA

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
Registered in United Kingdom (8) · France (2)
All fragments 13 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID209511296
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.23.221.152/29 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.23.236.0/27 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.252.152.88/29 FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.14.135.112/29 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.14.200.240/28 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.14.228.128/26 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.206.41.124/30 FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.68.40.24/29 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.41.17.192/28 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.41.122.240/28 NET-FR-SILCA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NET FR SILCA” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

COLT-FR-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PC80199-MNT