MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks7
All fragments 10 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID210568225
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
195.21.7.16/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.21.7.24/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.81.74.224/28 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.81.140.160/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.81.223.120/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.23.55.104/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.251.36.200/29 MEDIA-PLANNING-GROUP-NETS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “MEDIA PLANNING GROUP” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: F how networks compare →
14.3% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (1 of 7)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS3257-NET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE