LOMBARD-NET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
Registered in Switzerland (2) · China (2) · KZ (2) · Germany (1) · United Kingdom (1)
All fragments 37 blocks across 20 clusters
Cluster ID208913083
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 12 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

3 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-12

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
58.32.230.248/29 LOMBARD-CO APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
58.32.231.0/29 LOMBARD-CO APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
78.158.66.48/29 LOMBARD RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.218.80.240/30 LOMBARD RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
95.59.223.132/30 LOMBARD RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.15.57.96/30 LOMBARD-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.144.0.144/28 LOMBARD-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.243.38.64/29 LOMBARD-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “LOMBARD” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 20 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
87.5% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (7 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARCOR-MNT CH-UNISOURCE-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE HCM8-AP HCM8-AP HCM9-AP HCM9-AP KNIC-MNT MAINT-CHINANET-SH SARGASSO-MNT VTX-MNT