LM-NET TELECOM

Data as of 2026-10-04
BGP inherited
This organisation
Netblocks11 · 1,025 IPv4 addresses
IPv6 4 prefixes (largest 2804:65c0::/32)
Record ID245710798
RegistryBGP
Customerssee who runs inside this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 4 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works · report an issue

IP Ranges (11)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
45.184.144.205/32 LM-NET TELECOM PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
45.188.104.0/23 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
45.188.104.0/24 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
45.188.104.0/22 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
45.188.105.32/29 UNKNOWN LACNIC reassigned ● high
45.188.106.0/23 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
45.188.106.248/30 UNKNOWN LACNIC reassigned ● high
2001:12f8:0:13::205/128 LM-NET TELECOM PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2804:65c0::/33 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2804:65c0::/32 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2804:65c0:8000::/33 LM-NET TELECOM BGP ANNOUNCED ● high

IPv6 ranges (4)

CIDR
2804:65c0::/32
2804:65c0:8000::/33
2804:65c0::/33
2001:12f8:0:13::205/128

Footprint over time

7 weekly snapshots · JSON
14 +5 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 14 2026-10-04

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: F how networks compare →
14.3% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (2 of 14)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

26038693000103 AS269512 AS269512 ELDRO33 ELDRO33 PJJ5