Least-Cost-Telecom

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	9
All fragments	12 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID	209050570
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON

9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05

2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
81.223.75.96/29	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
83.64.223.160/28	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
83.65.56.96/28	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
83.65.187.104/29	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.124.133.24/29	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.124.166.144/29	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.125.30.80/28	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.125.30.192/28	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
85.125.44.16/29	Least-Cost-Telecom	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Least Cost” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

LEAST COST ROUTING TELECOM, SL 2 blocks
LEAST_COST_ROUTING 1 blocks

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

LEAST_COST_ROUTING via VODAFONE ONO, S.A. sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PRIO-MNT