Land-Transport-SG

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
All fragments 17 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID210205039
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
119.75.25.248/29 Land-Transport-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
128.106.2.128/29 Land-Transport-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
128.106.2.152/29 Land-Transport-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.125.17.128/29 LAND-TRANSPORT-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.125.18.32/29 LAND-TRANSPORT-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.125.208.200/29 Land-Transport-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.125.208.224/29 Land-Transport-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.125.233.72/29 LAND-TRANSPORT-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.127.9.184/29 LAND-TRANSPORT-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
203.127.68.112/29 LAND-TRANSPORT-SG APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Land Transport” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS2068-AP MAINT-SG-SINGNET SH9-AP SH9-AP