HOME-USER

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
All fragments 11 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID208908952
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
81.2.75.90/32 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.2.91.209/32 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.2.115.64/29 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.187.193.128/26 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.187.229.187/32 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.187.237.216/29 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.169.2.61/32 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.169.4.64/26 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.169.13.128/27 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2001:8b0:217::/48 HOME-USER RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “HOME USER” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
Possible discrepancies (1)

These blocks are registered to HOME-USER but cryptographically authorized for a different, unrelated network (1 distinct holder) — often M&A history, multi-homing, or outsourced/managed hosting, occasionally worth a closer look.

2001:8b0:217::/48 /48 authorized for AS20712 — Andrews & Arnold Ltd

NIC Handles

AA DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE