GPSystem-NET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 430 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 11 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID209372095
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
80.81.36.48/28 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.81.43.160/28 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
91.190.35.192/26 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
91.190.42.192/26 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.225.56/29 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.225.64/27 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.225.128/25 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.229.32/27 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.229.64/26 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.101.229.192/28 GPSystem-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “GPSystem” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE SNLV-MNT TCLV-MNT