FR-M-A-J

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
All fragments 17 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210178663
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
90.85.3.176/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.85.24.160/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.85.196.152/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.85.212.184/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.115.178.48/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.168.7.136/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.168.51.96/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.168.57.40/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.168.70.216/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.206.251.80/29 FR-M-A-J RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FR M A J” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PC80199-MNT