FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 17 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210225643
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
81.80.47.172/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.85.67.57/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.168.103.26/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.174.51.8/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.174.56.62/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.51.133.113/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.109.206.197/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.109.210.114/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.109.211.217/32 FR-D-MAX--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FR D MAX” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PC80199-MNT