FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 20 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210594562
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
81.255.33.92/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.83.236.154/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.83.248.45/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.121.150.93/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
90.121.193.192/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.206.36.150/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
194.250.153.169/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.56.133.1/32 FR-APSIDE--LB_INTERNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FR APSIDE” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE PC80199-MNT RAIN-TRANSPAC