FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 182 blocks across 22 clusters
Cluster ID209633147
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
2.228.243.0/28 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.97.182.112/29 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.97.227.224/28 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.223.166.112/28 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.49.200.32/28 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.51.193.136/29 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.51.212.216/29 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.56.21.40/29 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.63.207.32/29 FASTWEB-REGIONE_LAZIO RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FASTWEB REGIONE” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 22 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE FASTWEB-MNT