FASTWEB-AREA-001

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 70 blocks across 16 clusters
Cluster ID209642008
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
93.42.183.136/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.42.189.88/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.43.25.8/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.43.36.176/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.43.76.144/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.62.126.200/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.63.117.88/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.63.137.144/29 FASTWEB-AREA-001 RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FASTWEB AREA” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 16 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE FASTWEB-MNT