FABER-NET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
Registered in Germany (7) · Italy (2) · Greece (1)
All fragments 56 blocks across 23 clusters
Cluster ID208855288
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 9 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 4 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
5.7.135.208/29 FABER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.245.236.0/25 FABER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.16.206.160/29 FABER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
87.202.192.48/28 FABER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
92.79.126.144/29 FABER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
145.253.150.176/28 FABER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.204.94.240/29 FABER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.211.213.208/29 Faber_NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.211.217.136/29 Faber_NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
217.222.223.56/29 FABER-SPA RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “FABER” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 23 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
80.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARCOR-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE INTERB-MNT MDA-Z MNET-MNT OTENET-GR-MNT SCAN-PLUS-MNT TIG-MNT