F5_NETWORKS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
Registered in Netherlands (4) · United Kingdom (1)
All fragments 100 blocks across 6 clusters
Cluster ID209366817
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 3 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
62.209.34.196/30 F5_NETWORKS_GMBH RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
62.209.40.156/30 F5_NETWORKS_GMBH RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.4.159.128/27 F5-NETWORKS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.90.232.72/30 F5_NETWORKS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.90.242.28/30 F5_NETWORKS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2001:4d78:104:78::/64 F5_NETWORKS RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:104:d8::/64 F5_NETWORKS RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:400:121::/64 F5_NETWORKS_GMBH RIPE ASSIGNED ● low
2001:4d78:400:16e::/64 F5_NETWORKS_GMBH RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “F5 NETWORKS” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS5089-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EQUINIX-FULFIL-MNT EQUINIX-MNT