Egmont-net

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 1,310 IPv4 addresses
Registered in Denmark (5) · Poland (3) · Finland (1) · Croatia (1)
All fragments 40 blocks across 16 clusters
Cluster ID208994452
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 8 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 4 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
80.72.37.128/28 Egmont-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.210.98.248/30 EGMONT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
89.171.44.24/29 EGMONT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.253.85.0/24 Egmont-net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.253.86.0/24 Egmont-net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
185.253.87.0/24 Egmont-net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.163.154.0/24 Egmont-net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
193.163.155.0/24 Egmont-net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.91.106.128/30 EGMONT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.149.89.112/29 EGMONT-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Egmont” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 16 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
40.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (4 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AINA-MNT AS12810-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE ETOP-MNT NETIA-MNT dk-egmont-1-mnt dk-egmont-2-mnt