Digital Media Telematika

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 35 blocks across 12 clusters
Cluster ID213185948
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
119.11.184.164/32 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
123.108.8.102/32 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
202.159.50.85/32 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
218.100.74.152/32 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7fa:2:5::66/128 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2402:ac00:de00:de00:0:13:6121:1/128 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2403:1a00::d4/128 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2404:c8:0:a:0:13:6121:1/128 Digital Media Telematika PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Digital Media” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 12 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C how networks compare →
62.5% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (5 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS136121