DANAHER CORPORATION

Danaher
GLEIF verified
Complete entity footprint
2 linked clusters · 13 netblocks · 6,152 IPv4 addresses
This organisation's clusters combined by evidence — shared GLEIF corporate family — not name similarity, so genuinely different organisations that share a name are excluded.
View the full entity page →
LEI
S4BKK9OTCEWQ3YHPFM11
Registered name
DANAHER CORPORATION
Jurisdiction
US-DE
Ultimate parent
No parent on file in GLEIF
Cluster stats
Netblocks10 · 5,635 IPv4 addresses
Registered in United States (7) · Germany (1) · Netherlands (1)
All fragments 13 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID208812518
RegistryBGP
Owner jurisdictionUS-DE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution GLEIF legal-entity match
Legal identityLEI S4BKK9OTCEWQ3YHPFM11
Shared handles clustered on 11 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 4 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
64.90.112.0/24 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.112.0/23 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.113.0/24 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.114.0/23 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.114.0/24 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.115.0/24 Danaher BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
64.90.112.0 – 64.90.125.255 Danaher ARIN DIRECT ALLOCATION ● low
94.103.18.132/30 DANAHER RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
188.111.88.80/29 DANAHER-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2001:4d78:500:51e::/64 DANAHER RIPE ASSIGNED ● low

Corporate group (2 confirmed entities)

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “Danaher” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
30.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (3 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ARCOR-MNT AS18787 CK250-ARIN CK250-ARIN DANAHE-9 DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE EQUINIX-MNT JACOB569-ARIN NOC2406-ARIN NOC2406-ARIN