DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES

DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks7
All fragments 9 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID210216144
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
7 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 7 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (7)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
154.14.3.32/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.15.112/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.169.136/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
212.222.186.88/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.222.186.104/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.222.186.120/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.39.113.240/29 DAHER-SYSTEMES-INTEGRES-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “DAHER SYSTEMES INTEGRES” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
42.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (3 of 7)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS3257-IPAM-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE