CZ-V-COMNET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8 · 456 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 10 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID209927792
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
86.49.90.0/25 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.49.143.0/24 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.112.242.32/28 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.112.247.80/29 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.112.255.176/28 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.113.253.160/27 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.113.253.248/30 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
94.113.253.252/30 CZ-V-COMNET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CZ V” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE OSKR-MNT