CITI-NET

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9 · 401 IPv4 addresses
Registered in China (4) · Germany (1) · United Kingdom (1) · Italy (1) · Poland (1)
All fragments 40 blocks across 10 clusters
Cluster ID209584438
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 17 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 7 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

3 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-12

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
116.228.62.44/30 CITI-CO APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
222.66.70.36/30 CITI-GROUP APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
222.66.225.212/30 CITI-CO APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● high
31.6.210.128/25 Citi-Net RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
78.7.57.78/32 CITI RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
210.13.78.88/29 Citi APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
212.56.121.0/24 CITI-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
213.128.111.32/30 CITI-NET RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
2a00:2381:37eb::/48 CITI-GROUP RIPE AGGREGATED-BY-LIR ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CITI” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 10 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

ALBACOM-MNT ARCOR-MNT BTNET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE MAINT-AS6871 MAINT-CHINANET-SH MAINT-CNCGROUP-SH MULTIMEDIA-MNT WJF12-AP WJF12-AP XSH15-AP +5 more