CAST-TELECOM SL

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9 · 6,138 IPv4 addresses
All fragments 11 blocks across 3 clusters
Cluster ID210613780
RegistryBGP
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 7 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
103.77.228.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
185.185.196.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
193.32.212.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
2a0b:6380::/29 CAST-TELECOM SL BGP ANNOUNCED ● high
103.77.228.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL RIPE ALLOCATED PA ● low
185.185.196.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL RIPE ALLOCATED PA ● low
193.32.212.0/22 CAST-TELECOM SL RIPE ALLOCATED PA ● low
2a0b:6380::/29 CAST-TELECOM SL RIPE ALLOCATED-BY-RIR ● low
2a0c:b580::/29 CAST-TELECOM SL RIPE ALLOCATED-BY-RIR ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CAST TELECOM” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
88.9% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS206318 DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE ORG-CS463-RIPE RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT mnt-es-casto-1 mnt-es-casto-1