BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG

BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 9 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID210859498
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
154.14.4.96/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.11.40/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.12.192/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.17.192/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
154.14.115.224/27 BAUMANN-FEDERN-GTT RIPE LEGACY ● low
195.7.223.32/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.115.143.112/29 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
212.221.15.208/28 BAUMANN-FEDERN-AG-GTT RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “BAUMANN FEDERN” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: D how networks compare →
25.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (2 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS3257-IPAM-MNT AS3257-NET-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE