ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 17 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID208921457
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 5 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 8 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
80.118.139.160/27 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
80.118.171.32/29 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
81.1.49.192/27 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.96.23.68 – 84.96.23.75 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
84.96.28.64/27 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.45.64/27 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.237.32/27 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
109.2.237.92/30 ASSEMBLEE-NATIONALE RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “ASSEMBLEE NATIONALE” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE FMCF-MNT LDCOM-MNT LDCOM-PRO-MNT