AS2116-CUST-NEAS

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks10
All fragments 301 blocks across 142 clusters
Cluster ID204792017
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
10 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 10 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (10)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
85.221.20.0/23 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.221.22.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.221.57.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.221.62.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.252.171.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
85.252.188.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.18.129.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.204.27.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.204.32.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
195.204.237.0/24 AS2116-CUST-NEAS RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “AS2116 CUST” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 142 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS2116-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE