ANDREW-JONES
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 10 |
| All fragments | 12 blocks across 3 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 211706572 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
Footprint over time
5 weekly snapshots · JSON
10
0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05
peak 10
2026-07-19
IP Ranges (10)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2a01:4f8:120:24a8::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f8:13a:291::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f8:13a:1d12::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:6b:2222::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3051:12a7::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3051:4b6c::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3070:17d2::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:33ea::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3080:350d::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
| 2a01:4f9:3100:44e1::/64 | ANDREW-JONES | RIPE | ASSIGNED | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “ANDREW JONES” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- Andrew-JONES-000000008635031 1 blocks
- Andrew-JONES-000000007099009 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- Andrew-JONES-000000008635031 via British Telecommunications Limited sub-allocation
- Andrew-JONES-000000007099009 via British Telecommunications Limited sub-allocation
- Andrewjones Ap sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(10 of 10)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
HOS-GUN