suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 3,039 blocks across 2,489 clusters
Cluster ID211900084
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
58.210.82.128/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.136/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.144/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.152/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.160/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.168/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.176/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
58.210.82.184/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low
222.92.156.32/29 suzhou-CS-XIAOKANG-VILLAGE-COMMITTEE APNIC ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: F how networks compare →
11.1% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (1 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CH446-AP CH446-AP MAINT-CHINANET-JS