TERANET_RES_0
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 1 · 2,047 IPv4 addresses |
| All fragments | 5 blocks across 5 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 209567382 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (1)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.240.192.0/21 | TERANET_RES_0 | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● medium |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “TERANET RES” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- TERANET-RES-SPTHD1 1 blocks
- TERANET_RES_1 1 blocks
- TERANET_RES_3 1 blocks
- TERANET_RES_4 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- Flexoznak via ITERANET LLC sub-allocation
- Mediascope via ITERANET LLC sub-allocation
- TERANET-RES-SPTHD1 via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
- TERANET_BUS_2 via Celeste SAS sub-allocation
- ITERANETWORKSASNET via GlobalConnect AB sub-allocation
- Ooo Mir via ITERANET LLC sub-allocation
- Germestc via ITERANET LLC sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(1 of 1)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
CELESTE-MNT
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE