PT-VDF-CUST-ST01

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	3
All fragments	162 blocks across 154 clusters
Cluster ID	209022632
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (3)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
213.30.21.120/30	PT-VDF-CUST-ST01	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
213.30.37.208/28	PT-VDF-CUST-ST01	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low
213.30.86.240/30	PT-VDF-CUST-ST01	RIPE	ASSIGNED PA	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “PT VDF CUST” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Combined view of all 154 name-family clusters →

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

SHETTEL-CUST sub-allocation
ZOL-CUST-e08a sub-allocation
CUST5726-OWNIT-SE via Telenor Sverige AB sub-allocation
TWT-CUST-GO-828190 via UNIDATA S.p.A. sub-allocation
Cust 2A02 121E via Swisscom (Schweiz) AG sub-allocation
VERSATEL-CUST-OS-340194-A-1 via Odido Netherlands B.V. sub-allocation
SWISSCOM_CUST-178-174-57-248 via Swisscom (Schweiz) AG sub-allocation
SWISSCOM_CUST-146-4-53-72 via Swisscom (Schweiz) AG sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (3 of 3)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS12353-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE