NO-NETCOM-CSS-SP
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 1 |
| All fragments | 2 blocks across 2 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 208922841 |
| Registry | RIPE |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (1)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 212.45.173.160/27 | NO-NETCOM-CSS-SP | RIPE | ASSIGNED PA | ● medium |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “NO NETCOM CSS” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- NO-NETCOM-CSS-PORTAL 1 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- IPv4_RANGE_IDS_Holding_GmbH_over_NETCOM_BW via NetCom BW GmbH sub-allocation
- IPv4_Range_for_Kiesel_Sued_over_NetCom_BW via NetCom BW GmbH sub-allocation
- GRUPPO-NETCOM-SPA sub-allocation
- NETCOMUK-20 sub-allocation
- ISR-NETCOM via Claranet Limited sub-allocation
- Ospf Pool via NetCom BW GmbH sub-allocation
- GNNETCOMDK via TDC Holding A/S sub-allocation
- Pipex Netcommerce via Wavenet Limited sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A
how networks compare →
100.0%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(1 of 1)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
DUMY-RIPE
DUMY-RIPE
NETCOM-MNT