SONA

Handle
Cluster stats
Netblocks22
Registered in Netherlands (5) · United Kingdom (2) · Singapore (2) · AG (1) · Germany (1)
All fragments 78 blocks across 6 clusters
Cluster ID208802682
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution RIR handle
Shared handles clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

5 weekly snapshots · JSON
22 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 22 2026-07-19

IP Ranges (22)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
5.57.82.78/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
27.111.230.14/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
80.81.197.87/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
80.249.213.218/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
103.16.102.255/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
178.18.224.14/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
185.1.32.33/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
185.1.112.53/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
185.1.222.98/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
193.239.119.56/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
195.66.225.33/32 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8::ea76:0:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:1::a506:22:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:4::ea76:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:13::a506:22:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:17::ea76:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:83::6:22:2/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:8f::a506:22:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:7f8:b7::a506:22:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:de8:4::6:22:1/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:de8:12:100::255/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2a03:5f80:4::224:14/128 SONA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “SONA” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: B how networks compare →
86.4% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (19 of 22)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS60022