MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks9
All fragments 490 blocks across 348 clusters
Cluster ID208507660
RegistryRIPE
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 4 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
9 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 9 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (9)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
86.65.212.200/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.65.212.204/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.65.212.208/29 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.65.212.216/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.65.212.220/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.65.212.228/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.66.54.36/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
86.66.54.104/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low
93.17.29.24/30 MAIRIE-DE-BAILLEUL RIPE ASSIGNED PA ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “MAIRIE DE” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 348 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (9 of 9)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE LDCOM-MNT LDCOM-PRO-MNT