JM TELECOM LTDA

BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks8
All fragments 20 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID207724934
RegistryPEERINGDB
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 1 shared RIR contact/maintainer handle
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
8 -9 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 17 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (8)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
45.68.74.103/32 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
45.227.1.56/32 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
187.16.222.141/32 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
200.219.147.226/32 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:12f8::222:141/128 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:12f8:0:9::146:103/128 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:12f8:0:10::226/128 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high
2001:12f8:0:31::56/128 JM TELECOM LTDA PEERINGDB ASSIGNED ● high

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “JM TELECOM” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (8 of 8)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

AS272174