COCA-COLA-CHINA
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
| Netblocks | 3 |
| All fragments | 167 blocks across 42 clusters |
| Cluster ID | 207693715 |
| Registry | APNIC |
| Customers | find customers using this network → |
Evidence & provenance ?
| Attribution | BGP parent (inherited) |
| Shared handles | clustered on 6 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles |
| Registry names | 2 distinct registrant names across these blocks |
| full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works | |
IP Ranges (3)
⬇ export CSV| CIDR | Org name | Registry | Status | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202.96.192.168/30 | COCA-COLA-CHINA | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● high |
| 202.101.8.160/30 | COCA-COLA-CHINA | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● high |
| 120.86.69.32/27 | Coca-Cola-China-Co-Ltd | APNIC | ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE | ● low |
Possibly related to this organisation
what's this?Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “COCA COLA” — often
per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different
organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
- COCA-COLA 62 blocks
- COCA-COLA ICECEK ANONIM SIRKETI 25 blocks
- Coca-Cola-HBC-Austria-GmbH 23 blocks
- Coca-Cola HBC Schweiz AG 4 blocks
- COCA-COLA-LTD-TJ 3 blocks
- Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Deutschland GmbH 3 blocks
- Coca-Cola-Beveages 3 blocks
- COCA-COLA-GTUA 3 blocks
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own
naming convention, not a direct registration.
- COCACOLAHELLENIC-NET via Drustvo za telekomunikacije Orion telekom doo Beograd-Zemun sub-allocation
- APOLLO-COCA-COLA-HBC-EESTI-AS via SIA Tet sub-allocation
- Coca Cola Europacific Partners France via Orange S.A. sub-allocation
- COCACOLA-AM-NET via GNC-Alfa CJSC sub-allocation
- COCACOLANET via Visual Online S.A. sub-allocation
- Coca-Cola_Romania via Vodafone Romania S.A. sub-allocation
- COCA-COLA-AMSTERDAM sub-allocation
- Coca_Cola_Shumen via Vivacom Bulgaria EAD sub-allocation
Network trust
what's this?
RPKI hygiene: C
how networks compare →
66.7%
of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage
(2 of 3)
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.
NIC Handles
CG272-AP
CG272-AP
LZ289-AP
LZ289-AP
MAINT-CHINANET-SH
MAINT-CNCGROUP-GD