No.31, Jin-rong Street

CHINANET-HN-ZZ
BGP inherited
Cluster stats
Netblocks13
All fragments 139 blocks across 13 clusters
Cluster ID206492944
RegistryAPNIC
Customersfind customers using this network →
Evidence & provenance ?
Attribution BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names 1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

Footprint over time

4 weekly snapshots · JSON
13 0 netblocks since 2026-07-05
2026-07-05 peak 13 2026-07-13

IP Ranges (13)

⬇ export CSV
CIDR Org name Registry Status Confidence
61.137.9.0 – 61.137.14.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
61.137.95.0 – 61.137.98.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
61.150.168.0 – 61.150.179.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
61.187.95.0 – 61.187.103.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
202.103.74.0 – 202.103.81.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
202.103.115.0/24 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.75.192.0/19 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
218.76.160.0/20 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
220.170.32.0/19 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
220.170.160.0 – 220.170.183.255 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
220.170.184.0/21 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
222.241.192.0/19 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low
222.245.0.0/18 CHINANET-HN-ZZ APNIC ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE ● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?
Same name family
Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CHINANET HN” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.
Combined view of all 13 name-family clusters →
Sub-allocations under carriers
IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

Network trust

what's this?
RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →
100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (13 of 13)
RPKI-inferred operator No.31,Jin-rong Street
Nearly all of this network's RPKI-covered space is cryptographically authorized for this single operator — the registered netname is likely one of its internal infrastructure labels.
No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CH636-AP CHZ6-AP MAINT-CHINANET-HN