China Unicom

CHENG-SHI-RE-DIAN-ZI-XUN

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	2
All fragments	7 blocks across 4 clusters
Cluster ID	206426646
Registry	APNIC
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (2)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
219.239.207.144/29	CHENG-SHI-RE-DIAN-ZI-XUN	APNIC	ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE	● low
219.239.222.152/30	CHENG-SHI-RE-DIAN-ZI-XUN	APNIC	ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE	● low

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “CHENG SHI” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

DTAG-WAN-JHQ-RHEINDALEN-WINDSOR-MOENCHENGLADBACH-NET via Deutsche Telekom AG sub-allocation
FMKUECHENGES-HWY-AT via A1 Telekom Austria AG sub-allocation
Brg Kircheng At Net 01 via Citycom Telekommunikation GmbH sub-allocation
KIRCHENGASTS-HWY-AT via A1 Telekom Austria AG sub-allocation
KITCHENGURU-KAROO-KCOM via Vercara, LLC sub-allocation
TSCHECHENGEL-HWY-AT via A1 Telekom Austria AG sub-allocation
RAUTER-AT-CUST-HERTWICHENGINEERING-01 via Peter Rauter GmbH sub-allocation
BTECHENGINEERING via Eircom Limited sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (2 of 2)

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

MAINT-CN-DXTNET PP40-AP PP40-AP