Citycom Telekommunikation GmbH

BAS-SUCHT-AT-BLOCK

BGP inherited

Cluster stats

Netblocks	1
All fragments	2 blocks across 2 clusters
Cluster ID	206296278
Registry	RIPE
Customers	find customers using this network →

Evidence & provenance ?

Attribution	BGP parent (inherited)
Shared handles	clustered on 3 shared RIR contact/maintainer handles
Registry names	1 distinct registrant name across these blocks
full provenance (JSON) → · how attribution works

IP Ranges (1)

⬇ export CSV

CIDR	Org name	Registry	Status	Confidence
2a02:758:3065::/48	BAS-SUCHT-AT-BLOCK	RIPE	ASSIGNED	● medium

Possibly related to this organisation

what's this?

Same name family

Separately-registered clusters whose names share “BAS SUCHT AT” — often per-country or per-system registrations of the same brand, occasionally a different organisation sharing the name. Not counted in this organisation's own footprint.

BAS-SUCHT-AT-NET-01 1 blocks

Sub-allocations under carriers

IP blocks an ISP reassigned to a similarly-named customer — decoded from the ISP's own naming convention, not a direct registration.

SUCHTBERATUN-HWY-AT via A1 Telekom Austria AG sub-allocation
Notariusz-Adam-Suchta via Netia SA sub-allocation
SEHSUCHT-NET via Telefonica Germany GmbH & Co.OHG sub-allocation
Suchthilfe-Wien via Nessus GmbH sub-allocation
BAS-SUCHT-AT-NET-01 via Citycom Telekommunikation GmbH sub-allocation
Suchthilfe_Region_Basel via Iway AG sub-allocation
Gmbh via T-Mobile Austria GmbH sub-allocation
Sehnsuchtsorte-GmbH via T-Mobile Austria GmbH sub-allocation

Network trust

what's this?

RPKI hygiene: A how networks compare →

100.0% of checked blocks have valid RPKI ROA coverage (1 of 1)

RPKI-inferred operator Citycom Telekommunikation GmbH

Nearly all of this network's RPKI-covered space is cryptographically authorized for this single operator — the registered netname is likely one of its internal infrastructure labels.

No discrepancies found among checked blocks.

NIC Handles

CITYCOM-AT-MNT DUMY-RIPE DUMY-RIPE